Issa, Rand2023-07-142023-07-142022978-989-757-220-3http://hdl.handle.net/10437/14065Back to Human Scale : Rethinking Human Spaces for TomorrowArchitecture is yielded by use and design. The architectural realm is well known as a property of Architects “architecture is a heroic endeavor made by architects, guided by the masters” (Banham, 1975, p.3)*. Gropius articulated that the architect’s ultimate concern in designing buildings is represented in their human use and occupation. Therefore, questioning the architects’ perception of the users’ needs arises especially in times of crisis. Hereby, users are a threat to architects in terms of spatial transformation and how the building can adapt to reflect changes in use, and who between the architect, owner, and user, has the authority and knowledge to alternate the occupied form/ space. As if Functionalism is the starting point for most post-war architects’ assessment of use; flexibility, polyvalence, and user collaboration. Nowadays, the global pandemic emerged the necessity of the creative user to give existing spaces new meaning, a change of use that is not merely dependent upon a physical change but a change in the perception of the user toward the occupied space and the needs through the time of crisis. This paper is to concentrate on the intertwining role of the architect – the creative user who is not defined as a passive in the architecture realm but as a reactive user following the three types of creativity: mental, bodily, and physical. An analytical study of how users would shape their own space if they have the choice through a fixed space to design their quarantine based on the Covid-19 lockdownapplication/pdfengopenAccessARQUITETURAARCHITECTUREESPAÇOS ARQUITETÓNICOSARCHITECTURAL SPACESARQUITETOSARCHITECTSCRIATIVIDADECREATIVITYThe awareness of the past for an unknown future: the present act of the architect and the creative user in shaping spatial spaceconferenceObject