Revisão do estudo de ferramentas de modelagem ambiental para entender o real impacto dos produtos cosméticos na segurança ambiental
Miniatura indisponível
Ficheiros
Data
2023
Título da revista
ISSN da revista
Título do Volume
Editora
Edições Universitárias Lusófonas
Resumo
Em contraste com a avaliação de risco à saúde humana, não há diretrizes
definitivas para avaliação de risco ambiental de produtos cosméticos.
O objetivo deste estudo foi realizar uma análise aprofundada de dez
ferramentas de modelagem ambiental e estabelecer o melhor racional para
avaliar o impacto na segurança ambiental considerando o recente cenário
global de pandemia e evolução da mentalidade do consumidor. Foi realizada
uma análise da literatura para as dez ferramentas ambientais de modelagem,
sendo possível o download e comparação entre cada uma delas. O Chesar
foi a ferramenta que se mostrou mais fácil para inserir dados e tem as etapas
de aplicação mais claras e diretas e foi escolhida para a avaliação inicial de
ingredientes que demonstram potenciais riscos ambientais. Para ferramentas
de alto nível, não foi possível estabelecer comparação para escolha, pois os
modelos são particulares e possuem poucos dados na literatura. Mesmo
assim, para uma avaliação mais detalhada após a primeira avaliação inicial
via Chesar, o iSTREEM pode ser usado. Este estudo fornece conhecimentos
importantes sobre as ferramentas de modelagem e como estabelecer um
racional para a avaliação de risco ambiental.
In contrast to human health risk assessment, there are no definitive guidelines for environmental risk assessment of cosmetic products. The objective of this study was to perform an in-depth analysis of ten modeling environmental tools and to establish the best rationale to assess the impact on environmental safety considering the recent global pandemic scenario and the evolution of the consumer mindset. A literature analysis was performed for the ten modeling environmental tools, and when possible, each was downloaded for comparison. Chesar was the tool that proved to be the easiest to enter data, and it has the more straightforward and direct application steps; thus, it was chosen for the initial assessment of ingredients that demonstrate potential environmental hazards. For high-level tools, it was not possible to establish a comparison for choice, as the models are private and have little data in the literature. Even so, for a more detailed assessment after the first initial assessment via Chesar, iSTREEM could be used. This study delivers important knowledge about the modeling tools and how to establish a rationale for environmental risk assessment.
In contrast to human health risk assessment, there are no definitive guidelines for environmental risk assessment of cosmetic products. The objective of this study was to perform an in-depth analysis of ten modeling environmental tools and to establish the best rationale to assess the impact on environmental safety considering the recent global pandemic scenario and the evolution of the consumer mindset. A literature analysis was performed for the ten modeling environmental tools, and when possible, each was downloaded for comparison. Chesar was the tool that proved to be the easiest to enter data, and it has the more straightforward and direct application steps; thus, it was chosen for the initial assessment of ingredients that demonstrate potential environmental hazards. For high-level tools, it was not possible to establish a comparison for choice, as the models are private and have little data in the literature. Even so, for a more detailed assessment after the first initial assessment via Chesar, iSTREEM could be used. This study delivers important knowledge about the modeling tools and how to establish a rationale for environmental risk assessment.
Descrição
Biomedical and biopharmaceutical research : jornal de investigação biomédica e biofarmacêutica
Palavras-chave
CIÊNCIAS FARMACÊUTICAS, PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, PRODUTOS COSMÉTICOS, COSMETICS, IMPACTO AMBIENTAL, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT