Cadernos de Sociomuseologia nº 27 (2007) : Sociomuseology I

URI permanente para esta coleção:

http://hdl.handle.net/10437/11384

Navegar

Percorrer Cadernos de Sociomuseologia nº 27 (2007) : Sociomuseology I por autor "Bruno, Maria Cristina Oliveira"

A mostrar 1 - 2 de 2
  • Item
    Museologial action's main fields
    (Lusofona University, 2007) Bruno, Maria Cristina Oliveira; Faculdade de Ciências Sociais, Educação e Administração
    Museology has emerged and has been organised as a field of knowledge, precisely to frame the technical, theoretical and methodological aspects, regarding the constitution, implementation and evaluation of the processes that societies establish for the selection, treatment and extroversion of the memory indicators, transforming them into patrimonial references and projecting them into the constitutive fields of cultural heritage. It is therefore, one of the areas of knowledge that deals with the framing of heritage and their professionals are agents of memory education. The constitution of the parameters that define and delimit the museological action field has been outlined in the course of the centuries, if we consider the technical efforts related to the identification and organisation of collections, in addition to the curatorial treatment of specimens from nature, of objects, of the intangible heritage registers. The same length of elaboration is true if we evaluate the communication initiatives and of education of the senses.
  • Item
    Museology as a pedagogy for heritage
    (Lusofona University, 2007) Bruno, Maria Cristina Oliveira; Faculdade de Ciências Sociais, Educação e Administração
    This essay presents some parameters for the study of Museology and its respective contribution for the constitution of preservationist processes, biased towards heritage education. From the decoding of some parameters that delimit this applied discipline’s action and reflection field, the text presents some paradigms, which have stimulated its epistemological construction and have guided its social functions. These paradigms are considered responsible for a new methodological order within the scope of the museum and, further, for the new commitments that these institutions have taken up.