CeiED - Capítulos de Livros Internacionais

URI permanente para esta coleção:

http://hdl.handle.net/10437/11417

Navegar

Percorrer CeiED - Capítulos de Livros Internacionais por assunto "COCRIAÇÃO"

A mostrar 1 - 6 de 6
  • Item
    Are urban living labs the new normal in co-creating places?
    (Edições Universitárias Lusófonas, 2020) Bylund, Jonas; Riegler, Johannes; Wrangsten, Caroline; CeIED (FCT) - Centro de Estudos Interdisciplinares em Educação e Desenvolvimento
  • Item
    Assessing digital co-creation in urban transformations: Case of Vilnius
    (Edições Universitárias Lusófonas, 2020) Skaržauskienė, Aelita; Mačiulienė, Monika; Gudelytė, Laura; Mačiulis, Algimantas; CeIED (FCT) - Centro de Estudos Interdisciplinares em Educação e Desenvolvimento
    Public spaces play a vital role in urban democracy since they enable collective usage and reflection. One of the ways to make open public spaces more attractive and inclusive in modern times full of busyness is through the use of innovative digital technologies. Mobile and Internet-based interventions into public spaces deploy a number of strategies – from gathering data through GIS, syntax mapping to using digital tools to collect ideas and opinions of stakeholders. Digitization may often lead to bottom-up initiatives where the citizens and other stakeholders voluntarily employ their talent and resources to enhance the quality of life and solve problems of urbanized societies. This chapter presents methodological Digital Co-Creation Assessment Framework which considers a variety of aspects in the transformation of open spaces to co-creative systems: socio-cultural contexts, multi-stakeholder perspective, diversity in needs, incentives for participation of different groups and cooperation capabilities. The framework provides a useful approach to explore initiatives of digital co-creation as it allows to identify potential areas of improvement and to compare case studies on common indicators. However, definition of complex socio-technical systems, such as digital co-creation, is unavoidably partial, contextspecific and temporary. To test the applicability of the evaluation tool, the authors have chosen to analyse the transformation of Aukštamiestis district in Vilnius from a private space to a public place by conducting a case study analysis. The transformational nature of selected case study allowed to identify the limitations of proposed model and define the areas of improvement for applicability in varied contexts.
  • Item
    Categorisation of digital tools for co-creation of public open spaces. Key aspects and possibilities
    (Edições Universitárias Lusófonas, 2020) Erjavec, Ina Šuklje; Žlender, Vita; CeIED (FCT) - Centro de Estudos Interdisciplinares em Educação e Desenvolvimento
    Information and communication technologies (ICT) have the potential to contribute to the quality and attractiveness of public open spaces and to promote their inclusiveness through a co-creating approach, when ICT tools are used with consideration. There are many different digital tools available and all the time new ones are being developed. However, there is no scholarly consensus on which types of ICT tools are best to use in a specific stage of the co-creation process to effectively support the spatial planning process. This chapter explores the literature and discusses technological and spatial quality as well as user-related aspects of different types of digital tools. Our objective is to define the basis to better understand the different potential of digital tools to meet the needs of people and be useful for all the parties involved in the co-creation process with the focus on planning and development aspects of the quality of public open places. The chapter addresses the challenges faced by urban planners and designers when they wish to integrateICT into the process of planning and design and the complexity of the User – ICT – POS interlink. It also explains stating points for a categorization of digital tools for co-creation. Finally, it proposes a framework for classification of digital tools for co-creation. It also takes up the challenge of identifying the criteria for the assessment of existing ICT tools, their features, added values, suitability and usefulness at a particular stage of the public open space co-creation and development process, as well as paving the way for further analyses of their advantages and disadvantages in comparison to analogue tools.
  • Item
    Understanding co-creation within the public open space development process
    (Edições Universitárias Lusófonas, 2020) Marušić, Barbara Goličnik; Erjavec, Ina Šuklje; CeIED (FCT) - Centro de Estudos Interdisciplinares em Educação e Desenvolvimento
    Co-creation as an approach has gained increasing interest from both urban planning scholars and practitioners, since it gives an added value of inclusiveness and stakeholder integration into the planning process. To effectively use the co-creation approach for planning and successful establishment of public open spaces it is important to closely relate and adjust it to the different stages of the spatial development timeline. In the chapter, in-depth understanding of the relationship between co-creation activities and the spatial planning and development process of POS is presented with possible benefits as well as obstacles explained. The focus is on defining the comprehensive structure of interlinks and detailed explanation of supportive co-creation activities with the aim to give the useful background for mutual understanding between urban planning professionals and different stakeholders related to urban open space development for quality of life and environment.
  • Item
    Use and appropriation as the everyday design of public space in the Bexiga Neighbourhood (São Paulo)
    (Edições Universitárias Lusófonas, 2020) Gomes, Lucas Ariel; Pina, Silvia A. Mikami G.; CeIED (FCT) - Centro de Estudos Interdisciplinares em Educação e Desenvolvimento
    Bexiga is a historic and popular neighbourhood in São Paulo, situated between the ‘old’ city centre and the well-known banking district of Avenida Paulista. The public spaces in Bexiga thrive, despite disinvestment and lack of formal urban design initiatives. While some authors attest an ongoing dereliction of duty by the city administration towards this traditional neighbourhood, others celebrate the relative preservation of Bexiga’s architectural and cultural heritage. It is between neglect and resistance as social spaces that Bexiga’s public spaces are shaped. This chapter explores the collective nature of everyday use and its role not only as creator of the neighbourhood’s public spaces but also as designer of these spaces, albeit in latent form, through processes of use and appropriation. This rather informal character is addressed from the perspective of historical-critical research on the collective construction and evolution of Bexiga’s public spaces. Such informality provides juxtapositions of past and present, as well as of change and continuity. Led by an empirical field research, this chapter analyses the construction of public space through use and appropriation. Findings reveal that the informal character of public space implies a more fluid spatiality and relies significantly on its temporality and its collective character. The dynamics of everyday design is the result of a range of organised and impromptu actions, in such a way that an organised event can endure unexpected uses in the surrounding areas, embodying a fluid public space. There is an underlying logic in the location of these spaces, close to housing and cultural hubs. It is the persistent everyday repetition of ephemeral acts of use and appropriation that creates and designs vibrant living public spaces in the neighbourhood. This creation plays an important role in the cultural preservation of Bexiga, acting as a reinforcement of its collective origins and character.
  • Item
    Web 2.0 tools as framework for participation and co-creation
    (Edições Universitárias Lusófonas, 2020) Bizjak, Igor; CeIED (FCT) - Centro de Estudos Interdisciplinares em Educação e Desenvolvimento
    Web 2.0 has brought a plethora of new tools (such as Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and others) and new functionalities, for instance, the ability to co-create web content. The question that is being asked is whether these applications and online tools can be used as an alternative to non-electronic tools for participation in spatial planning processes. The co-creation process that these tools enable is also participation. Participation in urban planning is an important part of space planning that we share with different users of planned space. The chapter shows how the theory of participation can be associated with participatory methods that are used in spatial planning. And how to use them when choosing and creating electronic Web 2.0 tools of. However, to make the use of electronic tools easier for non-professionals from the field of Information and Communication Technology (ICT), we have selected electronic tools designed for collaboration and participation to be integrated into a generative web framework. Various electronic tools are described in this chapter, with different ways of using in the processes of participation and co-creation. One tool that was developed for the needs of a certain European project from the field of integration of local initiatives in revitalizing urban public spaces of contemporary cities and could be used for other similar purposes will be described in more detail. An analysis of the tool used and the responses of those who used it will also be presented.