O paradoxo do termo avaliação em museus : Um problema da maior relevância para a museologia contemporânea
Miniatura indisponível
Ficheiros
Data
2006
Autores
Título da revista
ISSN da revista
Título do Volume
Editora
Lusofona University
Resumo
Encontramo-nos actualmente diante de um paradoxo: enquanto o conceito de museu tem sido reexaminado de maneira critica ao nível da museologia – a ponto de ter gerado um novo paradigma que veio “revolucionar” o sentido da palavra Museu e encontrou na designada Nova Museologia outras semânticas, outros conceitos que geraram formas alternativas de descrever e nomear as suas práticas e procedimentos, obrigando a cooptar para o léxico museológico termos como: Processo; comunidade; participação; território; desenvolvimento; cidadania, entre outras palavras, que têm sido progressivamente incorporadas no discurso museológico contemporâneo com eficácia comunicacional, porque correspondem a conceitos e categorias assimiladas e bem definidas a partir de práticas. Em relação ao termo avaliação tal não se verifica porque, quanto a este, existe uma evidente dissonância entre o conceito, a forma de o nomear e a operacionalidade das ferramentas avaliativas.
We are currently facing a paradox: while the concept of the museum has been reexamined in a critical manner as it regards to museology – to the point of having generated a new paradigm that has “revolutionized” the meaning of the word Museum, it has also found in the newly designated New Museology, other semantics and concepts that generated alternative forms of describing and naming its practices and proceedings, forcing us to co-opt for a museological lexical containing terms such as: Process; community; participation; territory; development; and citizenship among others. These have progressively been incorporated into the contemporary museological discourse with communicational efficacy because they correspond to assimilated and well-defined concepts and categories which have resulted from practical actions. In relation to the term evaluation, this has not been verified because there is an evident dissonance between the concept, the way of enunciating it, and the operability of the evaluating tools.
We are currently facing a paradox: while the concept of the museum has been reexamined in a critical manner as it regards to museology – to the point of having generated a new paradigm that has “revolutionized” the meaning of the word Museum, it has also found in the newly designated New Museology, other semantics and concepts that generated alternative forms of describing and naming its practices and proceedings, forcing us to co-opt for a museological lexical containing terms such as: Process; community; participation; territory; development; and citizenship among others. These have progressively been incorporated into the contemporary museological discourse with communicational efficacy because they correspond to assimilated and well-defined concepts and categories which have resulted from practical actions. In relation to the term evaluation, this has not been verified because there is an evident dissonance between the concept, the way of enunciating it, and the operability of the evaluating tools.
Descrição
Cadernos de Sociomuseologia
Palavras-chave
MUSEOLOGIA, MUSEUS, AVALIAÇÃO, MUSEOLOGY, MUSEUMS, EVALUATION
Citação
Victor , I 2006 , ' O paradoxo do termo avaliação em museus : Um problema da maior relevância para a museologia contemporânea ' , Cadernos de Sociomuseologia .