Uso do IOP-29 na deteção da simulação de sintomas : uma revisão sistemática de literatura
Miniatura indisponível
Data
2021
Título da revista
ISSN da revista
Título do Volume
Editora
Resumo
O objetivo do presente estudo foi revisar sistematicamente os trabalhos científicos
que utilizaram o 'Inventory of Problems 29' (IOP-29) para detetar a simulação de sintomas.
Para isto foi utilizada como palavra-chave “Inventory of Problems-29", tendo sido realizada a
pesquisa nas bases de dados do Google Académico e na Biblioteca do Conhecimento Online
(b-On). Posteriormente, também foi verificado o site do Iop-test.com. Todos os resultados
foram importados para uma tabela do programa Microsoft Excel para a gestão dos dados e
análise dos resultados. Foram então analisados 17 artigos entre população forense, adultos não
clínicos e vários simuladores experimentais. Foi possível observar que o IOP-29 é capaz de
diferenciar bem entre simuladores experimentais e pacientes honestos; há evidências iniciais
que sua eficácia é mantida em diferentes culturas e países; o poder diagnóstico dos pontos de
corte tradicionais do IOP-29 (ou seja, > 50) possui uma boa combinação entre sensibilidade e
especificidade com valores acima de 70% de eficácia em ambos; há evidências iniciais que
sua eficácia se mantém em contextos em que a aplicação é feita on-line. Esta eficácia, no
entanto, pode ser aumentada quando se utiliza o também recém desenvolvido 'Inventory of
Problems - Memory' (IOP-M) como medida complementar. A combinação com outras
ferramentas que podem ser utilizadas para a deteção da simulação de sintomas, como o 'Test
of Memory Malingering' (TOOM) e o 'Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory' (MMPI 2), indicou um aumento de eficácia durante o reconhecimento de simulação. Alguns estudos
também sugeriram que o IOP-29 possui uma eficácia superior ao Rey Fifteen Item Test (FIT),
Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) e ao Structured Inventory of Malingered
Symptomatology (SIMS).
The purpose of this study was to systematically review scientific works that used the 'Inventory of Problems 29' (IOP-29) to detect the malingered symptomatology. In this regard, the keyword “Inventory of Problems-29” was used, and a search was carried out in the Google Scholar databases and in the Online Knowledge Library (b-On). Right after, Iop test.com was also checked. All results were imported into a Microsoft Excel table for data management and results analysis. Seventeen studies were then submitted for analysis among the forensic population, non-clinical adults, and various experimental simulators. It was possible to observe that the IOP-29 is able to differentiate well between experimental simulators and honest patients; there is early evidence that its effectiveness is maintained across cultures and countries; the diagnostic power of traditional IOP-29 cut off scores (i.e., > 50) has a good combination of sensitivity and specificity with values above 70% effectiveness in both; there is initial evidence that its effectiveness remains in contexts where the application is made online. This effectiveness, however, can be increased when using the also newly developed 'Inventory of Problems - Memory' (IOP-M) as a complementary measure. The combination with other tools that can be used for symptom simulation detection, such as the 'Test of Memory Malingering' (TOOM) and the 'Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory' (MMPI-2), indicated an increase in effectiveness during recognition. of simulation. Some studies also suggest that IOP-29 is more effective than the Rey Fifteen Item Test (FIT), Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS).
The purpose of this study was to systematically review scientific works that used the 'Inventory of Problems 29' (IOP-29) to detect the malingered symptomatology. In this regard, the keyword “Inventory of Problems-29” was used, and a search was carried out in the Google Scholar databases and in the Online Knowledge Library (b-On). Right after, Iop test.com was also checked. All results were imported into a Microsoft Excel table for data management and results analysis. Seventeen studies were then submitted for analysis among the forensic population, non-clinical adults, and various experimental simulators. It was possible to observe that the IOP-29 is able to differentiate well between experimental simulators and honest patients; there is early evidence that its effectiveness is maintained across cultures and countries; the diagnostic power of traditional IOP-29 cut off scores (i.e., > 50) has a good combination of sensitivity and specificity with values above 70% effectiveness in both; there is initial evidence that its effectiveness remains in contexts where the application is made online. This effectiveness, however, can be increased when using the also newly developed 'Inventory of Problems - Memory' (IOP-M) as a complementary measure. The combination with other tools that can be used for symptom simulation detection, such as the 'Test of Memory Malingering' (TOOM) and the 'Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory' (MMPI-2), indicated an increase in effectiveness during recognition. of simulation. Some studies also suggest that IOP-29 is more effective than the Rey Fifteen Item Test (FIT), Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS).
Descrição
Orientação: Ana Rita Cruz
Palavras-chave
MESTRADO EM NEUROPSICOLOGIA APLICADA, PSICOLOGIA, SINTOMATOLOGIA, REVISÃO BIBLIOGRÁFICA, TESTES PSICOLÓGICOS, IOP-29, PSYCHOLOGY, SYMPTOMATOLOGY, BIBLIOGRAPHIC REVIEW