Validation of a new tool for evaluating subjects’ satisfaction with medicine package leaflets: a cross sectional descriptive study.

Ver registo simples
dc.contributor.authorPires, Carla Maria Batista Ferreira
dc.contributor.authorRosa, Pedro Joel
dc.contributor.authorVigário, Marina
dc.contributor.authorCavaco, Afonso Miguel das Neves
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-01T11:47:15Z
dc.date.available2022-02-01T11:47:15Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionSao Paulo Medical Journalpt
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Package leaflets of medicines need to be intelligible, but tools for their evaluation are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To validate a new tool for assessing subjects’ satisfaction with medicine package leaflets (LiS‑RPL). DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional descriptive study conducted in two regions of Portugal (Lisbon and Centre). METHODS: 503 participants (53.1% male) were selected according to convenience and homogenously distributed into three groups: 1 to 6; 7 to 12; and > 12 years of schooling. LiS-RPL was developed based on international regulation guidelines and was initially composed of 14 items. Twelve package leaflets were tested. Dimensionality calculations included: exploratory factor analysis and minimum rank factor analysis; Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index and Bartlett’s sphericity test to assess matrix adequacy for exploratory factor analysis; exploratory bifactor analysis with Schmid-Leiman solution to detect possible existence of a broad second-order factor; and Bentler’s Simplicity Index and Loading Simplicity Index to assess factor simplicity. Diverse coefficients were calculated to assess reliability. RESULTS: Minimum rank factor analysis detected a two-factor or single-factor structure. Exploratory factor analysis with 12 items showed a two-factor structure, explaining 69.11% of the variance. These items were strongly correlated with each other (r = 0.80). Schmid-Leiman: all items seemed to represent the general factor (loadings above 0.50), which was 76.4% of the extracted variance. Simplicity indices were good (percentile 99): Bentler’s Simplicity Index of 0.99 and Loading Simplicity Index of 0.48. Internal consistency indexes indicated good reliability. LiS-RPL was shown to be homogenous. CONCLUSION: LiS-RPL is a validated tool for evaluating subjects’ satisfaction with medicine package leaflets.en
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationPires C., Rosa, P. J., Vigário, M., & Cavaco, A. (2019). Validation of a new tool for evaluating subjects’ satisfaction with medicine package leaflets: a cross sectional descriptive study. Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 137(5):454-462 DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2019.0123160919pt
dc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2019.0123160919
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10437/12586
dc.language.isoengpt
dc.publisherSao Paulo Medical Journalpt
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectCIÊNCIAS FARMACÊUTICASpt
dc.subjectMEDICAMENTOSpt
dc.subjectINFORMAÇÃO EM SAÚDEpt
dc.subjectREGULAÇÃO DA SAÚDEpt
dc.subjectESCALAS DE AVALIAÇÃOpt
dc.subjectPHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCESen
dc.subjectDRUGS (PHARMACOLOGY)en
dc.subjectHEALTH INFORMATIONen
dc.subjectHEALTH REGULATIONen
dc.subjectASSESSMENT SCALESen
dc.titleValidation of a new tool for evaluating subjects’ satisfaction with medicine package leaflets: a cross sectional descriptive study.pt
dc.typearticlept

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura indisponível
Nome:
transferir.pdf
Tamanho:
186.83 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
Ver/Abrir
Licença
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura indisponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:
Ver/Abrir

Coleções

ULHT/HEI-Lab - Artigos de Revistas Internacionais com Arbitragem Científica